Event attendees facing altercations or unauthorized restraint by private security lack early, continuous video evidence, making it difficult to establish liability before venue security footage is overwritten or deleted.
Event attendees who experience physical altercations, missing belongings, and alleged misconduct by private event security struggle to establish clear evidence and secure legal accountability without video proof from the start.
Do I have a case from this event in LA?
Unless there's video of the incident from the beginning, it's going to be tough
commentUnless there's video of the incident from the beginning, it's going to be tough, does the venue have a security camera there? how long ago was it? - it's less so than when actual tape was used, but they likely still delete them after a time. If you hire a lawyer and file a lawsuit you MIGHT be able to get them Before you do that, think back and be extra sure you're remembering who started it correctly and as unbiased as possible. It's going to be a good bit of money to get to that point, and if the video shows you being aggressive or giving a little push first, you're spending a lot of money to refresh your memory. As for the telling you they were police officers, they might have been, many cops pick up shifts as security guards. This would probably be bad for your case, a lot of people will take the word of cops over even video evidence, and if they're acting as poorly as you describe it's likely that they're practiced at getting out of other similar stuff they've done.
Frequent live-event and nightlife attendees seeking immediate, tamper-proof incident recording and evidence preservation to protect against legal exposure or missing property.
Repeated complaints focus on lack of continuous video proof from the start of an incident and rapid loss/deletion of evidence before legal action can begin.
Unlike standard phone camera apps, ProofGuard streams encrypted evidence directly to off-device cloud storage instantly (preventing device seizure tampering) and automates immediate legal spoliation notices to enforce venue footage preservation.
A quick-trigger mobile app that silently streams continuous cloud-backed audio/video footage, automatically stamps GPS and timestamp metadata, and generates immediate formal evidence preservation (spoliation) demand notices to venues.
Users facing potential legal disputes or lost property face thousands in legal fees or unrecoverable losses; paying $19 to instantly lock down venue CCTV and secure cloud evidence provides massive immediate ROI.
“Capture tamper-proof evidence and lock venue footage before it vanishes.”
A quick-trigger mobile app that silently streams continuous cloud-backed audio/video footage, automatically stamps GPS and timestamp metadata, and generates immediate formal evidence preservation (spoliation) demand notices to venues.
Direct-to-consumer digital marketing via festival/nightlife communities on Reddit (r/festivals, r/EDM, r/concerts) and partnerships with venue safety advocate creators.
Certain jurisdictions require multi-party consent for audio recording in non-public spaces, potentially limiting legal admissibility.
Security personnel grabbing the phone before recording is initialized prevents evidence capture.
Venues may ignore non-attorney preservation demands unless backed by formal legal counsel process.
Run an Investment Memo to get a structured Go / No-Go verdict, competitor landscape, unit economics, and a 90-day validation roadmap for this opportunity.
Generate an investment memoThis idea scores in the upper-middle range of opportunities surfaced by MonetScope, with a validation sub-score of 8/10 against 3 independently sourced evidence signals. A "promising" rating usually indicates a real pain has been detected and discussed in the open, but the pipeline did not find enough signal to flag it as urgent or high-frequency. These opportunities can still produce excellent businesses — they often correspond to "boring" problems that established players have ignored — but the founder should expect a longer customer-development cycle to confirm willingness to pay.
It sits at the intersection of "automation", "eventgoers", "legal", which makes it relevant to a specific subset of founders rather than a generic horizontal opportunity. Opportunities in this category typically reward founders who can describe the pain in the user's own language — both because that's the basis of effective marketing, and because it's the strongest signal that the founder has done the upfront listening. The MonetScope pipeline surfaces this category alongside other other signals, which is why it appears here rather than in a generic "trending ideas" feed.
Scores are derived from real forum discussions across Reddit, Hacker News and X, weighted by evidence volume and signal quality. How scoring works
MonetScope does not generate ideas from a language model's imagination. Every opportunity on this site is anchored to specific source posts and comments from real public discussions — typically on Reddit, Hacker News, or X — where actual users describe the pain in their own words. The AI's role is structuring, scoring, and grouping those signals into a navigable opportunity, not inventing the problem.
MonetScope's spider pipeline runs continuously and surfaces opportunities as new evidence accumulates. The "Updated" date in the header reflects the most recent re-scoring of this specific opportunity. Most other opportunities visible in the public catalog draw from discussions in the last 30-60 days; older signals are de-prioritized because user pain shifts faster than most founders assume.
Overall score is a composite across six dimensions — pain, urgency, willingness to pay, market size, defensibility, and execution ease — designed to give a single number for triage. Validation score is narrower: it asks "how cleanly does the same signal repeat across independent sources?" An opportunity can score high on overall but lower on validation when one or two large discussions dominate the evidence; conversely, validation can be high on a smaller-overall idea where the signal is consistent but the addressable market is modest.
